Discussion Papers
نویسندگان
چکیده
.................................................................................................................................5 Tiivistelmä..............................................................................................................................6
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers in the Result and Discussion Sections of Literature and Engineering Research Papers
This study compares metadiscourse markers in result and discussion sections of literature and engineering research papers. To this end, 40 research articles (20 literature and 20 engineering) are selected from two major international journals. Based on Hyland’s (2005) model of metadiscourse, the articles are codified in terms of frequency, percentage, and density of interactive and interactiona...
متن کاملDiscussion of Road Accidents in Iran (SHORT COMMINUCATION).
Several comments are made regarding the recent papers by F. Ayati on road accidents in Iran.
متن کاملMTID DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 74 PRODUCER SUPPORT ESTIMATES (PSEs) FOR AGRICULTURE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: MEASUREMENT ISSUES AND ILLUSTRATIONS FROM INDIA AND CHINA
MTID Discussion Papers contain preliminary material and research results, and are circulated prior to a full peer review in order to stimulate discussion and critical comment. It is expected that most Discussion Papers will eventually be published in some other form, and that their content may also be revised. MTID Discussion Papers contain preliminary material and research results, and are cir...
متن کاملAutomated Fault and Disturbance Data
This paper gives a set of questions stimulated by twenty one papers submitted by the authors from twelve countries, two papers being submitted by the members of the WGB5.03 “ Fault and disturbance data analysis including intelligent systems”. The papers are written in response to the preferential subject PS2: Automated Fault and Disturbance Data Analysis. To facilitate the discussion, papers ar...
متن کاملComputer supported collaborative learning in a clerkship: an exploratory study on the relation of discussion activity and revision of critical appraisal papers
BACKGROUND Medical students in clerkship are continuously confronted with real and relevant patient problems. To support clinical problem solving skills, students perform a Critical Appraisal of a Topic (CAT) task, often resulting in a paper. Because such a paper may contain errors, students could profit from discussion with peers, leading to paper revision. Active peer discussion by a Computer...
متن کاملsz> I iljrj
Note: Covles Foundation Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical coaaaent. Requests for single copies of a Paper vlll be filled by the Covles Foundation within the limits of the supply. References In publications to Discussion Papers (otjber than mere acknowledgement by a writer that he has access to such unpublished material) should be cleared...
متن کامل